CPRE Cornwall
Main Menu
Contact Us
Alerts
News
Policies
Editorial Comment
Renewable Energy
Housing
Planning
Events
Campaigns and Publicity
CPRE Cornwall Site Index
Membership and Support
Links
Officers
Reaction to the Government's announcement of an Eco-Town for St Austell
Friday, 17 July 2009

Reaction to the Announcement of an Eco-Town near St Austell 

 

CPRE Cornwall, the county’s leading environmental organisation, learned with dismay to day of the Government’s intention to proceed with the construction of an eco-town near St Austell. It is CPRE Cornwall’s contention that the St Austell eco-town is not appropriate for the following eight reasons: 

 

 

(1) it is not an eco-town, but six eco-villages;  

 

(2) there is no need for an eco-town in this location, or elsewhere in Cornwall, because there is unlikely to be sufficient local employment opportunities; 

 

(3) the local infrastructure is inadequate (roads, shops, schools, community facilities etc) to support these communities and this problem is likely to be made worse not better;  

 

(4) that the housing provided by the six eco-villages would be in addition to those being imposed by the Government through its Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS); 

 

(5) the sites are being brought forward outside the normal planning system for such developments, contrary to previous Government statements and guidance on how such large development proposals should be handled;  

 

(6) the impact of 4 and 5 is that local communities have had little, if any, say in the site selection process and will now be largely restricted to commenting on the details of the eco-town not the principle. Communities have not been engaged in the planning process; they have merely been told how their environment is going to change forever. This is fundamentally wrong, unfair and undemocratic; 

 

(7) that the current land owner and user would, it appears,  be excused from an obligation to reinstate land spoilt by china clay extraction; and 

 

(8) that the current land owner appears to substantially profit by selling land that has been spoilt to a developer while local communities have to live with the consequences. 

 

 

The Government’s choice of St Austell for an eco-town is, of course, subject to planning consent being obtained. 

 

Richard Ward and Ted Venn

16th July 2009 

                                                                                                                                                                         

  

Editorial Comment:

 

 

These six eco-villages are being imposed on Cornwall.  Local opinion is being brushed aside, as the Government continues to push on regardless in its effort to achieve its own partisan objectives.  Furthermore, the development of six eco-villages near St Austell is additional to the 68,700 new homes that the Government is endeavouring to impose on Cornwall by 2026.  Together with a possible massive increase in wind farms, the Government’s housing programme will destroy Cornwall’s economic base that is heavily dependent on tourism.  With more and more countryside lost to development, the county will cease to be attractive to holidaymakers and those seeking to live in Cornwall.

 

Richard Ward, Planning and Development Manager for CPRE Cornwall, explained the situation by saying:

 

These eco-villages are not wanted, not needed, nor do they have the support of local communities.  They are in fact being imposed on local people without the normal planning system being followed.  There is no chance in my view that they will work, have the necessary jobs needed to be sustainable, and either be exemplar or high quality developments as was originally proposed.  A recent announcement on the need to reduce Government spending in future years suggests that essential infrastructure facilities will also be missing.  We are likely therefore to just end up with volume house building with little if any affordable houses which are urgently needed.”

 

He went on to say “The area is quite capable of being improved and regenerated without these proposals, which have the potential along with the decision to build more wind farms to destroy the very thing that makes this county attractive to residents and tourists, its special environment.”

 

 

So that sums it up: Cornwall’s environment is at stake!  However, as a General Election must be held within the next eleven months, the public has a chance to redress the situation by asking parliamentary candidates to listen to the people of Cornwall, and to act on their views.  Candidates that fail to act in accordance with the wishes of those from whom they seek support, do so at their peril!

 

Ted Venn

17th July 2009

 

 
Eco-town plans fail to comply with EU Rules
Sunday, 11 January 2009
 

Eco-town plans fail to comply with EU rules

 

From an Article in The Daily Telegraph on Saturday, January 10th, 2009

 

The following article was written by Louise Gray, the Telegraph's Environment Correspondent, and it appeared on page 14 of last Saturday's edition.

 

Plans for eco-towns could be thrown out under European law, according to a damning report that describes government strategy on the troubled project as "exceptionally poor".

 

William Sheate, an expert in environmental assessment and an adviser to the European Commission, was commissioned by Bard, a group campaigning against the eco-town plans, to look at the draft plans for the 15 short-listed sites.

 

Up to 10 of the developments, which are designed to be environmentally-friendly, will get the go-ahead.  But Mr Sheate said the strategic environmental assessment, which is part of the planning process, fails to comply with European rules.  He said this was because not enough alternatives were considered, nor how the eco-towns would be developed.

 

He said many of the arguments in the strategy were illogical.  For example, the Government's "zero-carbon" claim for eco-towns excludes any carbon dioxide produced by the expected increase in transport.

 

Mr Sheate said the environmental assessment as it currently stands is "exceptionally poor".

 

The report comes after criticism of eco-towns by environmental groups and planning authorities.

 

Margaret Beckett, the housing minister, is due to make a decision on the final shortlist later this year.  A spokesman for the Department of Communities and Local Government insisted the Government had acted correctly throughout the process.

 

Editorial Comment from CPRE Cornwall

 

This is good news, perhaps, for the proposal to build an eco-town near St Austell.  Has the Government, in its rush to meet targets on carbon emissions and at the same time solve the apparent housing crisis, been too eager to fully consider or reveal the dangers that would be caused to the environment by such "eco-development"?

 

Ted Venn

11th January 2009

 
Higher Standards for Eco-Towns
Thursday, 24 July 2008
 

HIGHER STANDARDS FOR ECO TOWNS - A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION

 

CPRE has welcomed the publication today (Thursday, July 24th) of two reports setting out the Government's latest thinking on eco-towns. They describe standards eco-towns should achieve, the planning process and timetable [1].

 

Kate Gordon CPRE's senior planner said:

 

‘The signs are that the Government is starting to listen to people's concerns about eco-towns.  We are delighted that the Government has decided to delay publishing a Planning Policy Statement on eco-towns until September and to consult stakeholders about what it should contain in the meantime. Ultimately, we would prefer a statement explaining how statutory planning procedures should be followed, rather than yet another PPS.' 

 

‘We welcome some of the standards announced today, such as a minimum of one job provided per house and locating homes within ten minutes walk of services. Some standards need to be made more challenging. For example:

 

  • if transport plans are to reflect the very best European examples they should aim for significantly less than 50% of trips by car;
  • homes should achieve Sustainable Code Level Six, rather than Four [2], given that Level Six will be mandatory for all new development by 2016;
  • a measure of zero carbon should apply to the whole settlement, covering transport as well as buildings.'

 

 

CPRE remains concerned, however, about the planning process for agreeing where eco-towns are built.  It is calling on the Government to ensure that decisions on eco-towns do not ride roughshod over normal planning procedures.  

 

Kate Gordon concluded:

 

‘Many people are rightly concerned about a programme that has been pursued outside the planning system [3].  Local and regional plans enable proposals to be tested in the light of their effects on the environment and local communities who agree where and how development should take place. The Government should make it clear how these arrangements will be safeguarded.'

 

 

NOTES

 

 

1    Eco-towns living a greener future: progress report and Eco-towns: Sustainability appraisal - Scoping report for the Planning Policy Statement on Eco-towns, published by Communities and Local Government are available from:

 

http://www.communities.gov.uk/corporate/publications/all/

 

2    The Code measures the sustainability of a new home against categories of sustainable design, rating the ‘whole home' as a complete package.  The Code uses a 1 to 6 star rating system to measure the sustainability performance of a new home.  The Code sets minimum standards for energy and water use at each level and, within England, replaces the EcoHomes scheme, developed by the Building Research Establishment (BRE). On the 27 February 2008 the Government announced a mandatory rating against the Code would be required for new homes from 1 May 2008.  Further information is available from:

 

http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/england/professionals/en/1115314116927.html

 

3    A legal opinion by counsel for the Local Government Association casts doubt on the legality of the eco-towns process and suggests grounds on which a legal challenge may be made. Key concerns raised in the opinion are the conflict between identifying and promoting specific eco-towns in a Planning Policy Statement and the plan led-process and questions over whether the Government's approach will fulfil requirements for Strategic Environmental Assessment under the EU Directive. CPRE shares the LGA's concerns.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 9 - 12 of 81